News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Family fun with deepfakes by platz on Friday February 02, 2018 @11:04AM (#16291577)
did we really post that link at the same time, or did you edit your other response to match?
Re:Family fun with deepfakes by cf498 on Friday February 02, 2018 @11:12AM (#16291643)
I posted the Böhmermann incident 2 minutes prior and see it more as an example for the state of the art in video manipulation. I think its hard to see the response back then as an example of future interaction with the topic of video fakes. Which when it comes to altering faces in videos is still in the future.

I edited the post you replied to with "in a video." in the first sentence to clearify

Re:Family fun with deepfakes by tome on Friday February 02, 2018 @11:45AM (#16291940)
His response was generated by a GAN.
Re:Family fun with deepfakes by cf498 on Friday February 02, 2018 @11:50AM (#16291996)
Could you elaborate? I dont understand what you are talking about
Re:Family fun with deepfakes by tome on Friday February 02, 2018 @12:40PM (#16292394)
It's ironic that on a discussion about copying images of parts of someone's body over to images of another person's platz would ask "did we really post that link at the same time, or did you edit your other response to match?" i.e. copying over parts of one person's comment to another person's.

(And the GAN is the neural network model which does these transformations)