News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Announcing Linode Block Storage Volumes by jcadam on Thursday February 01, 2018 @04:34PM (#16286130)
I don't know, I'm currently using Linode and am trying to keep my stuff as platform-agnostic as possible (just give me dumb Linux boxen).

Most of the great new features proliferating on other providers seemed designed to encourage vendor lock-in. On my current project, I made one concession to my usual aversion to proprietary lock-in and went with AWS S3 for storage of user uploads (also looked at Azure's offering but my BizSpark application was denied, so meh), since there really is no equivalent. I'd thought about using Linode's beta block-storage (which would have probably been more performant), but I was afraid I would be forever fighting with managing volumes and nfs mounts (or massively overbuying capacity).

Re:Announcing Linode Block Storage Volumes by tyingq on Thursday February 01, 2018 @07:50PM (#16287409)
S3 API compatible object storage is pretty agnostic. Google supports that, for example. Would be a more meaningful announcement from Linode than this one, at least for me.
Re:Announcing Linode Block Storage Volumes by alexhayes on Friday February 02, 2018 @12:26AM (#16288625)
As does DO
Re:Announcing Linode Block Storage Volumes by jcadam on Friday February 02, 2018 @03:29PM (#16293945)
So you're saying I done good. I feel slightly better :)
Re:Announcing Linode Block Storage Volumes by tyingq on Friday February 02, 2018 @05:46PM (#16294853)
Heh, yes. The S3 API/protocol is becoming a defacto standard. Even supported in proprietary things like NetApp storage appliances.