News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon HQ2 finalists should refuse tax breaks, say nearly... by danielvf on Wednesday January 31, 2018 @11:22AM (#16275000)
Yes, possibly legal. Still a form of economic sanctions though.

It's not just that they don't require employees to travel there, they also don't pay for trips "This bill would prohibit a state agency from ... approving a request for state-funded or state-sponsored travel to ..."

The bill doesn't explicitly forbid government employees (and by extension, the government of California) from doing business with North Carolina - it just adds personal, out-of-pocket cost for doing so. (which probably amounts to the same effect.)

Re:Amazon HQ2 finalists should refuse tax breaks, say nearly... by tptacek on Wednesday January 31, 2018 @11:48AM (#16275223)
In the scenario you propose, California isn't prohibited from paying to fly NC contractors to CA.

Travel from a prohibited state, including the return flight back, shall be construed as travel “to” the original destination.