News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on UK mass digital surveillance regime ruled unlawful. Parent comment

Re:UK mass digital surveillance regime ruled unlawful by jstanley on Tuesday January 30, 2018 @11:18AM (#16266477)
> Of course, if it turns out that anyone was actually affected by the legislation as it stands then that should be dealt with as a matter of urgency.

How do you decide whether "anyone was actually affected" by ISPs storing as much browsing data as they can? Doesn't that affect either everyone or noone depending on whether you think it matters? And if it matters, does it not affect everyone? What can you possibly do about that retroactively?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:UK mass digital surveillance regime ruled unlawful by blowski on Tuesday January 30, 2018 @01:03PM (#16267384)
If Shirley lost £1,000,000 and a body part as a result of the ISP’s actions, she’s affected more than somebody who’s merely annoyed and feels their human rights have been breached.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:UK mass digital surveillance regime ruled unlawful by hoopladler on Wednesday January 31, 2018 @07:32PM (#16278826)
The point about surveilance is it doesn't effect anyone, until it does - and then everybody gets arrested in the night. We're just a couple of decades out of the twentieth century - and if the more bloody-handed of the last century's regimes had today's databases, they would have been far worse.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:UK mass digital surveillance regime ruled unlawful by 794CD01 on Tuesday January 30, 2018 @01:08PM (#16267418)
They could give everyone a year of free credit monitoring.
[ Parent | on HN ]