News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google doesn’t necessarily need innovation by edanm on Thursday January 25, 2018 @12:01PM (#16232373)
I wouldn't trivialize food delivery. Eating is literally something everyone has to do, multiple times a day. Improving it by eg making it cheaper, or healthier, is an enormous benefit to society.

I mean, I didn't think about it much before, but now that I have a child, the days of just throwing together random things from the fridge doesn't cut it, and ordering takeout is too expensive. It's either cook every few days or spend tons of money.

If the market starts giving me cheaper, healthier options than ordering pizza, then I'd consider it a huge quality of life improvement, not to mention a huge time saver.

Re:Google doesn’t necessarily need innovation by Thriptic on Thursday January 25, 2018 @02:04PM (#16233535)
If someone came out with a service where I could get healthy meals delivered to me, with decent nutritional macros (a bunch of protein, not just vegis), and costs which were substantially less than eating out, I would be standing outside their offices on day 1 waiting to sign up. Healthy food delivery services do exist, they just end up being astronomically expensive when you look at the amount of food (calories or macros) you get for your money. I was looking at one a few days ago which was trying to charge me 10-12 dollars for a single 400 calorie meal. As a lifter who eats 3500 calories per day, that is an absolute non-starter.
Re:Google doesn’t necessarily need innovation by bogomipz on Thursday January 25, 2018 @02:43PM (#16233900)
>"Improving it by eg making it cheaper, or healthier, is an enormous benefit to society."

Just making food cheaper is not an "enormous" benefit to society. For evidence of this see the dollar menu at McDonalds[1]. Food delivery has existed for years now in the US and EU. Please provide any evidence that these services have resulted in either cheaper or healthier food consumption.

[1] http://time.com/money/5085896/mcdonalds-dollar-menu/

Re:Google doesn’t necessarily need innovation by edanm on Thursday January 25, 2018 @03:25PM (#16234294)
err I did write cheaper or healthier. Obviously both is a good option, too.

And I don't know for sure that these new delivery services will result in cheaper and/or healthier foods. I'm guessing (and hoping) that, as per the article, relying on these new delivery "layers" will provide more options, and more options will translate to lower prices.

But either way, that doesn't matter. My disagreement with parent was only whether it's valuable to improve things like food delivery, and I pointed out that the food industry, in general, is incredibly important to most people's lives, so trying to improve it is a huge value to society.