If they can apply it yearly, they can fine 2.2 billion per year, which is over a third of Qualcomm's 5.3 billion per year profit.
Sure it's a simple napkin calculation, but as long as the napkin calculation comes out to "not worth it" that's fine.
Source for numbers: http://markets.businessinsider.com/stock/QCOM/financials
I wondered what the ultimate reason was for Microsoft to bow down and apply the required changes to windows, but I imagine being labeled as a recurent law breaking business might have a lot of side effects.
At a very small scale, I knew engineers that didn’t want to apply for MS jobs because of that. I wonder if individual states or other regulation agency also would change their stance regarding a company once behavior change requested by the EU are ignored on a regular basis.
(Source: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELE...)