The unlikely success of California’s Sonic.net (2012)

Re:The unlikely success of California’s Sonic.net (2012) by Animats on Tuesday January 23, 2018 @01:42AM (#16211529)

I've had Sonic service for about 15 years. I recently upgraded to 50Mb/s down, 6 Mb/s up. It's provided through AT&T, but there are no monthly caps and no middle boxes. They just forward the IP packets. Sonic is also in favor of net neutrality.

How's the fiber service in SF coming? Anyone on that?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The unlikely success of California’s Sonic.net (2012) by moonman272 on Tuesday January 23, 2018 @06:15AM (#16212625)

So good it hurts, I never want to move again...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The unlikely success of California’s Sonic.net (2012) by sankyo on Wednesday January 24, 2018 @01:45AM (#16220852)

Sunset district - Gigabit fiber $72/month with mandatory phone service. I regularly get 580-700Mbps down and 550-750Mbps up. Symmetric! And it is always up. I am a very happy customer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The unlikely success of California’s Sonic.net (2012) by m15i on Tuesday January 23, 2018 @01:52AM (#16211569)

Very fast. Unfortunately I have only a wifi connection to my house's fiber, but still getting above 100 Mbps up and down. And less expensive and more reliable than comcast.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The unlikely success of California’s Sonic.net (2012) by jtmcmc on Tuesday January 23, 2018 @11:17AM (#16214686)

it's also moving to the east bay now!

[ Parent | on HN ]