Nuclio: Serverless for Real-Time and Data-Driven Applications

Re:Nuclio: Serverless for Real-Time and Data-Driven Applicat... by jacques_chester on Monday January 22, 2018 @06:51PM (#16209360)

Let me put it another way: are you saying you have no cold-start penalty?

Edit: and to answer your question -- no, I have not personally benchmarked it. Can you point me to your suite? I've been thinking it would be useful to work on a benchmark that different implementations can share to catch regressions (and earn bragging rights, of course).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nuclio: Serverless for Real-Time and Data-Driven Applicat... by yaronhaviv on Tuesday January 23, 2018 @09:59AM (#16214035)

Great idea, we suggested to create an open benchmark at CNCF, a bunch of members opposed, we can come with a joint proposal. You can use our test tool https://github.com/v3io/http_blaster, it can generate a workload of > 600K http req/sec with one client and is programable.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nuclio: Serverless for Real-Time and Data-Driven Applicat... by jacques_chester on Tuesday January 23, 2018 @07:08PM (#16219148)

Do you have a link to the benchmarking discussion? I'd be interested to see what the objections were.

I raised the topic today in a team meeting and I'll probably get to tinker over the next few weeks. I'm interested in exploring a few different axes of stress. RPS is one, but also things like "how does it behave with ten thousand functions installed?", "how does it behave with traffic yo-yoing?" etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]