Re:Vim gets support Lua and the latest versions of Perl and ...
by akavlie on Friday August 20, 2010 @01:23PM
(#1620975)
Yes, I think you're the only one.
Good syntax highlighting is essential for me; I won't use an editor without it.
It makes the code easier to read, and leads to less bugs (due to typos, etc.)
Re:Vim gets support Lua and the latest versions of Perl and ...
by thezilch on Friday August 20, 2010 @01:28PM
(#1620994)
Not only can you define your own highlighting, but there are hundreds of others that have made available their preferences.
Try any one of these a run; you may be pleasantly surprised to know that highlighters "assume" nothing... http://vimcolorschemetest.googlecode.com/svn/html/index-c.ht...
Re:Vim gets support Lua and the latest versions of Perl and ...
by hernan7 on Friday August 20, 2010 @02:44PM
(#1621199)
Thanks, I'll take a look to see if I find a color scheme that I can live with :)
Re:Vim gets support Lua and the latest versions of Perl and ...
by thwarted on Friday August 20, 2010 @01:52PM
(#1621052)
I see red characters on a black background as "deeper" into the screen than blue, most often if they are right next to each other. It's a neat effect. It doesn't bother me normally, I often have to actually look for it.
This doesn't stop me from having syntax highlighting on, however.
Also, it seems most syntax highlighters assume the opposite of the color scheme that I'm using (black text on clear background, or white text on dark background). I guess that would also be derived from Murphy's Law...