Re:Ray Kurzweil Responds to "Ray Kurzweil does not understan...
by jasongullickson on Friday August 20, 2010 @11:55AM
(#1620715)
Based on this post (and more so what I've been able to find of the original discussion) I don't think he's overlooking this at all; if anything it's so obvious that he's not calling it out literally, like saying "I'm building an automobile"; you don't expect to have to say it's going to have wheels...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ray Kurzweil Responds to "Ray Kurzweil does not understan...
by scott_s on Friday August 20, 2010 @12:23PM
(#1620801)
That's because we already know how a car works. We know that wheels and an engine are necessary, but a cupholder is not. Meyers' point, as I understand it, is our understanding of the brain is not yet sophisticated to know what we can exclude from simulation.