News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Is big-endian dead? by astrodust on Friday January 19, 2018 @03:42PM (#16189595)
The PDP successor, the VAX, was strangely little-endian.
Re:Ask HN: Is big-endian dead? by gumby on Friday January 19, 2018 @06:26PM (#16190894)
PDP-11 had a little endian architecture while big endian machines like the PDP-6/PDP-10 predominated on the net.

To make life more interesting, the later PDP-10/20 mainframes used PDP-11 minicomputers as front end processors and often as network processors so byte-swapping was the norm. Luckily the PDP-10 allowed bytes ranging from 1-36 bits wide - “byte” had not yet standardized on 8 bits

Re:Ask HN: Is big-endian dead? by dasmoth on Friday January 19, 2018 @04:16PM (#16189941)
Not that strange — it was really the successor of the PDP-11, which was a quite different architecture.
Re:Ask HN: Is big-endian dead? by watmough on Friday January 19, 2018 @04:09PM (#16189876)
Could Dave Cutler have foreseen ... nahhh!