News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is it time for open processors? by fghtr on Friday January 19, 2018 @07:42AM (#16185768)
QubesOS is dealing with the problem you describe. It implements security through isolation. But the vulnerabilities in CPU break everything.
Re:Is it time for open processors? by lazyjones on Friday January 19, 2018 @08:00AM (#16185880)
The approach is helpful, perhaps not very practical (do I maintain N different browser installations in my qube for N different tasks, or is it a single installation where malware can therefore affect all qubes?). But remember that OS and libraries have plenty of bugs too.
Re:Is it time for open processors? by nine_k on Friday January 19, 2018 @01:23PM (#16188440)
I suppose that an OS running transparently on an actual cluster of many independent cores, not linked even by a common L2 cache, could allow to separate security domains much more reliably.

Single-thread performance would suffer, though, unless you're ready to pay quite a lot. And it's still hugely important in many cases.

Re:Is it time for open processors? by harlanji on Saturday January 20, 2018 @11:03AM (#16193789)
There is a Linux scheduler option for cpuset accessible via cgroups iirc, that pins execution to a set of cores. I've not used it.