Ending the individual mandate will likely reduce the number of people buying insurance from ACA marketplaces, but that isn't going to dramatically change the price of other insurance (to the extent it has an impact, it will probably push insurance prices up...).
The tax cuts are, at present, going to largely be paid for by borrowing money.
Spoiler alert: It's a remake. Trickle-down doesn't work.
Investing significant money in businesses doesn't create more work. Increasing demand creates more work. How do you do that? You put more money into the hands of consumers, which is the opposite of what this bill did.
beyond that, I have seen me and many others see immediate returns. your position is already starting from a hole, but I am a wait and see kind of person.
I hope it works out, you should too, unless you are one of those people who just want to see the world burn types.
Are you in the bracket of a typical American taxpayer or the bracket of a typical HN-er?
> I am a wait and see kind of person.
We've been slashing taxes on corporations and the wealthy since the Reagan era under the trickle down philosophy, but we're still waiting for that money to actually trickle down: https://www.epi.org/productivity-pay-gap/
If 50 years isn't a long enough experiment for you, what is?
I am interested in seeing where this goes. if we do see wage growth from it, it provides evidence to a lot of questions about how the cost of healthcare was squeezing out our wages. if it doesnt, then a lot of complaints about corporations will have a lot more evidence.
putting all that aside, this news about apple bringing over the cash is a huge win for everyone. having that money sit and do nothing was pretty much bad for everyone.