News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ex-CIA Officer Suspected of Compromising Chinese Informan... by tptacek on Tuesday January 16, 2018 @11:28PM (#16165470)
It's unclear what it is you think needs to be done here, and since the preceding post seems to suggest that our government persecute the families of those suspected to be involved in espionage, some clarity would be welcome.
Re:Ex-CIA Officer Suspected of Compromising Chinese Informan... by rdl on Tuesday January 16, 2018 @11:46PM (#16165538)
I assume he was pointing out why having family or close connections overseas and in a potentially hostile or at least adversarial nation has long been a factor in clearance investigations.
Re:Ex-CIA Officer Suspected of Compromising Chinese Informan... by rdl on Thursday January 18, 2018 @11:27PM (#16184149)
Er, I missed the second part of this.

I don't advocate them doing anything unconstitutional; merely that in the initial clearance process and ongoing clearance process for cleared employees that relations hostile or adversarial foreign powers continue to be a factor in investigation. It might mean putting more resources into specifically China-focused CI in the screening and review process. It might mean longer clearance processing (as a result) for people with extensive contacts with China (and since I go to China multiple times/year, I'd fall under this). It might mean borderline cases with lots of connections to China get denied whereas lots of connections to e.g. Brazil don't.

And this should be much higher for people in particularly sensitive positions (like case officers at CIA) vs. NASA scientists working on largely open source science.

Re:Ex-CIA Officer Suspected of Compromising Chinese Informan... by whatyoucantsay on Wednesday January 17, 2018 @07:50AM (#16167461)
Interesting. Would you then see refusing top secret security clearance to a spouse or sibling of a spy to be "persecution"?