> Why do you assume that Bitcoin is one of these few winners, rather than the multitude of losers?
I didn't state that Bitcoin would be a winner, and in fact stated in my comment that Bitcoin may cease to exist as a software product. My criticism is more directed toward those who don't believe the blockchain is a useful data construct and that the research taking place today into blockchains and cryptocurrencies are a dead end.
Why do you assume that Bitcoin is one of these few winners, rather than the multitude of losers? The default position should be "failure"; it's not irrational.