News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Curse of a New Building by terra_t on Wednesday August 18, 2010 @03:48PM (#1615365)
A friend of mine who has created several successful non-profit organizations adds a "no buildings" clause to the bylaws of every new organization he creates.

He believes that once non-profit organizations accumulate some capital, the first thing they do is build a big new building, and that's the beginning of a downhill slide.

Re:The Curse of a New Building by aycangulez on Wednesday August 18, 2010 @05:14PM (#1615622)
Unfortunately, the same mentality applies to universities, too. They love to build new buildings instead of hiring the best faculty.
Re:The Curse of a New Building by djcapelis on Wednesday August 18, 2010 @06:35PM (#1615846)
Might have something to do with the fact that university donors love to build new buildings instead of just giving the university money to be spent on HR. (And then the university doesn't have a guaranteed funding source for a top professor? Yikes!)

Endowed chairs work a bit better, but those usually don't go towards new recruitment.

Re:The Curse of a New Building by unwind on Thursday August 19, 2010 @05:52AM (#1616919)
Isn't that, in turn, perhaps because oftentimes donors then get to name the building? At least this seems common in the US, but that's just an observation from the outside.
Re:The Curse of a New Building by madh on Thursday August 19, 2010 @01:21AM (#1616590)
Yep. Large donors also like to only pay for constructing buildings, not maintaining them.
Re:The Curse of a New Building by Throlkim on Thursday August 19, 2010 @07:29AM (#1617045)
My university did exactly this. (Supposedly) spent anywhere between £5 mil and £50 mil on a new building; £80,000 on their opening ceremony with lots of local celebrities; and then left all the students with 4 year-old hardware for design/video courses.

I really appreciated the sterile white-washed building for creative courses while attempting to use After Effects on a G5 iMac :|