Re:Domains are inefficiently priced -- small domain owners a...
by nanairo on Wednesday August 18, 2010 @03:23PM
(#1615274)
It also could go to subsidies the free (or cheap) extensions.
For example: .com could cost 15$ instead of 7$, but .net could go from 7$ to 3$ or even less.
Yes, you would end up with Internet ghettos, and "high-street" areas, but given it's only the extension, and a .com address is not really surrounded by other .com addresses, then it's not such a bad thing.
For example: .com could cost 15$ instead of 7$, but .net could go from 7$ to 3$ or even less.
Yes, you would end up with Internet ghettos, and "high-street" areas, but given it's only the extension, and a .com address is not really surrounded by other .com addresses, then it's not such a bad thing.