News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Proof of burn: An alternative method for distributed cons... by contrarian_ on Monday January 15, 2018 @08:30AM (#16150334)
> The idea would be that you want sellers to pay something to participate in the market

What? Why would you want to do that beyond covering expenses for scam prevention?

Re:Proof of burn: An alternative method for distributed cons... by sillysaurus3 on Monday January 15, 2018 @08:35AM (#16150367)
Trust level. If you see a seller advertise 1 teddybear for sale, and you know they burned 3 teddybears worth of coins just to offer you that first teddybear, you can be pretty certain they're not going to run off with your money.

On the other hand, if a new seller didn't spend anything, they could run off with your coins on the first transaction.

This isn't just theoretical; it's the central problem in most darknet markets.

Re:Proof of burn: An alternative method for distributed cons... by lifeisstillgood on Monday January 15, 2018 @08:43AM (#16150416)
And if they are participating just to build a sufficient level of trust before doing a runner, then you are saying there must be a ratio of "trust to stake" - maybe 1:1 at first maybe increasing - it would be interesting to know what market makers in stock exchanges run at - 1:10 or more?
Re:Proof of burn: An alternative method for distributed cons... by wastewaste on Monday January 15, 2018 @11:50AM (#16151610)
absolute non sequitur. I'd just think burning the stuff was mad destructive.
Re:Proof of burn: An alternative method for distributed cons... by Tepix on Monday January 15, 2018 @08:31AM (#16150338)
Spam prevention.