News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Domains are inefficiently priced -- small domain owners a... by notahacker on Wednesday August 18, 2010 @02:09PM (#1615010)
I'm not sure that domain registries attempting to extract maximum value from .com would have made the market more efficient...
Re:Domains are inefficiently priced -- small domain owners a... by nanairo on Wednesday August 18, 2010 @03:19PM (#1615257)
Why not? You could also auction being the registry for .com domains: if it's worth so much they will spend more money, which the ICANN can use to subsidised as needed.

As an example look at the auctions for the mobile phone frequency licences: that worked pretty well.

Re:Domains are inefficiently priced -- small domain owners a... by notahacker on Wednesday August 18, 2010 @04:18PM (#1615461)
The same problem with evaluating the value of domains exists; no effective price signalling and temporal fluctuations in the value of a domain to any individual.

Moreover, by capturing much of the value of domains currently realised by the domain aftermarket, the registrars would remove much of the little amount of signalling in the market that currently exists.

It's like suggesting that dysfunction in the labour market would be reduced if wages were set by a really big organisation, like the government.

Re:Domains are inefficiently priced -- small domain owners a... by nanairo on Wednesday August 18, 2010 @04:25PM (#1615485)
But I didn't say ICANN would set the prices, I said it would auction them. Not sure I understand how your point applies.