Re:Chile’s salmon farms may use more antibiotics than any ot...
by barrkel on Sunday January 14, 2018 @07:03PM
(#16147396)
Boycotting isn't individual choice, however; boycotts, when they work, usually work due to PR and reputational effects rather than market effects.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Chile’s salmon farms may use more antibiotics than any ot...
by fpoling on Monday January 15, 2018 @03:21AM
(#16149278)
Boycotting works through the stubborn minority rule [1]. Sometimes even less than 1% of the total population can enforce their rule for the whole country. This works as long as the rest of population finds the rule does not bother them match.
Re:Chile’s salmon farms may use more antibiotics than any ot...
by TeMPOraL on Monday January 15, 2018 @05:14AM
(#16149660)
Wait, wait, wait.
I thought it was universally acknowledged that boycotts, generally, don't work, because you can almost never find and coordinate enough people that care.
Re:Chile’s salmon farms may use more antibiotics than any ot...
by fpoling on Monday January 15, 2018 @07:43AM
(#16150131)
The case of Kosher wine from the link shows how about 0.3% of population forced almost all wines in US to be Kosher by boycotting non-kosher wines. The important thing is that the minority should be distributed across the whole population uniformly.