Re:Cloud companies consider Intel rivals after security flaw...
by quonn on Saturday January 13, 2018 @04:41AM
(#16138927)
How can CORS possibly be related to image pixels in any way?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cloud companies consider Intel rivals after security flaw...
by missblit on Saturday January 13, 2018 @10:34AM
(#16139912)
It's to prevent reading cross-origin images through JavaScript.
A canvas is considered tainted if it contains data from a cross origin image that was loaded without CORS approval. Tainted canvases cannot be read from by JavaScript.
I don't think this requires a 1000x slowdown but I'm not super familiar with this area of the spec. It should be possible to cache the tainted state of the canvas in a single bit, only updating it when adding new images to the canvas, and checking the bit when converting the canvas to an array.
Re:Cloud companies consider Intel rivals after security flaw...
by bitL on Saturday January 13, 2018 @07:19AM
(#16139308)
For some reason every single pixel access must be authorized through CORS. I am not sure if this is in the standard or just shoddy implementation in all browsers. Try it yourself, read pixels in one non-CORSed image, and then in CORSed and wonder what went wrong on the drawing board. Some people bypass it via WebGL.
Re:Cloud companies consider Intel rivals after security flaw...
by DiThi on Saturday January 13, 2018 @06:04PM
(#16141881)
> Some people bypass it via WebGL.
How? There's no concept of a tainted WebGL canvas because it just can't load textures without CORS.