Re:House Votes to Renew Surveillance Law, Rejecting New Priv...
by noobermin on Thursday January 11, 2018 @07:16PM
(#16129336)
There is a nuance here.
The Dems are better. They are better than republicans on this, but they certainly aren't good enough. That is the unfortunate part. But if you definitely want a better chance for civil liberties, voting for R's will hurt you worse than if you vote for D's, significantly so.
Re:House Votes to Renew Surveillance Law, Rejecting New Priv...
by CWuestefeld on Friday January 12, 2018 @05:53PM
(#16137040)
But if you definitely want a better chance for civil liberties, voting for R's will hurt you worse than if you vote for D's
I suppose that depends which civil liberties are more important to you. You'll find that Democrats are pretty awful if you value your right to self-defense, or if you don't think the government should be able to use eminent domain to take your property and give it to a wealthy supporter.
Some of the details may be different, but they're both different sides of the same coin. I don't see that one side is significantly better than the other overall.
Re:House Votes to Renew Surveillance Law, Rejecting New Priv...
by aaronbrethorst on Saturday January 13, 2018 @08:20PM
(#16142334)
Chelsea Manning seems to agree that the Democrats are better, too. Otherwise, I don't think she'd be running for Senate as one: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/chelsea-manning-files-us-...
I am sure it will be easy for her to explain "Violating the Espionage Act, stealing government property, violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, multiple counts of disobeying orders" on her job application.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/mar/12/bradley-mannin...