News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on House Votes to Renew Surveillance Law, Rejecting New Privacy Limits. Parent comment

Re:House Votes to Renew Surveillance Law, Rejecting New Priv... by bgentry on Thursday January 11, 2018 @05:28PM (#16128650)
Edit: your house.gov link is in fact wrong. This is the correct link. http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll014.xml

My Twitter link shows Dems who voted against the USA Rights amendment, and my house.gov link is for the bill itself. It is possible (and in fact likely) that a rep who voted no on the amendment would support the bill without it.

Your house.gov link is for the amendment, so it should reflect the same votes as the image in the tweet.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:House Votes to Renew Surveillance Law, Rejecting New Priv... by loteck on Thursday January 11, 2018 @05:40PM (#16128752)
The twitter link discusses no votes on the Amash amendment. Your house link is not the vote on the Amash amendment.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:House Votes to Renew Surveillance Law, Rejecting New Priv... by bgentry on Thursday January 11, 2018 @05:48PM (#16128809)
Maybe I worded my reply poorly, because that is exactly what I was trying to say. Let's try this again.

Dems who voted against the Amash/USA Rights amendment: https://twitter.com/gzornick/status/951501089047764992

All votes for the Amash/USA Rights amendment: http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll014.xml

All votes on S. 139, aka the main bill: http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll016.xml

[ Parent | on HN ]