News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Brutal Lifecycle of JavaScript Frameworks by eitland on Thursday January 11, 2018 @11:57AM (#16125415)
> It can be done but it's brutal and fragile.

Actually many who did jQuery were proud of it.

Some of us made rock solid sites or improved exiting ones quite a bit using a technology known as progressive enhancement.

Let me tell you what is fragile: the cool things I make today that won't even try to work if I disable Javascript. :-)

Edit: and given what we have seen over the last few days now would be a good time to reconsider if every website really needs to be able to run Javascript.

Re:The Brutal Lifecycle of JavaScript Frameworks by djroomba on Thursday January 11, 2018 @01:23PM (#16126304)
I miss progressive enhancement, when/why did it die.
Re:The Brutal Lifecycle of JavaScript Frameworks by bronson on Thursday January 11, 2018 @02:01PM (#16126682)
Did progressive enhancement ever catch on? It made for some great Rails 2 tutorials but I don't remember seeing it much in the wild.

It's going away because you basically have to write everything twice and it's hell to keep consistent.

Re:The Brutal Lifecycle of JavaScript Frameworks by Can_Not on Friday January 12, 2018 @08:04AM (#16132493)
If you need your website to work without JS, Nuxtjs is an amazing VueJS framework for SSR or static prerendering.