News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Brutal Lifecycle of JavaScript Frameworks. Parent comment

Re:The Brutal Lifecycle of JavaScript Frameworks by Cthulhu_ on Thursday January 11, 2018 @11:21AM (#16125094)
Similarly, JQuery questions remain higher than the other ones in that chart; does that mean JQuery remains popular, or that JQuery is hard and people need a lot of help for it?

Speaking for myself, it was often easier to copy / paste SO answers (in jquery) than try and figure things out for myself. I can imagine a lot of beginning developer start with jQuery and go to advanced frameworks after that.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Brutal Lifecycle of JavaScript Frameworks by wwweston on Thursday January 11, 2018 @12:25PM (#16125692)
In addition to the possibilities you listed, it might mean:

* most sites aren't SPAs, and progressive enhancement of a document with light interactivity via jQuery is a development model that's a good fit for those sites

* progressive enhancement of a document is an easier development model to move into from having started to author HTML & CSS than many of the SPA frameworks (note that this is also true of PHP), and many training materials that bring people into web authoring use js+jQuery as the next step

* many sites aren't rewriting their codebases particularly frequently, and anything used there remains relevant longer.

[ Parent | on HN ]