News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Passenger (mod_rails) released by tptacek on Friday April 11, 2008 @02:31PM (#161225)
The answer to this is probably obvious, but, can someone sell my on why I want mod_rails? What's wrong with the tag-team app server / web server architecture?
Re:Passenger (mod_rails) released by DocSavage on Friday April 11, 2008 @02:40PM (#161235)
You're probably not the target audience. It's meant to ease deployment so it's more like PHP in a LAMP setup.

In the author's words (http://www.modrails.com), here are the main features:

- Deployment is only a matter of uploading application files. No Ruby on Rails-specific server configuration required!

- Built on the industry standard Apache web server.

- Allows Ruby on Rails applications to use about 33% less memory, when used in combination with Ruby Enterprise Edition (optional).

- Zero maintenance. No port management, server process monitoring or stale file cleanup required. Errors are automatically recovered whenever possible.

- Designed for performance, stability and security. Passenger should never crash Apache even in case of crashing Rails applications.

- Well-documented, for both system administrators and developers!

Re:Passenger (mod_rails) released by rob on Friday April 11, 2008 @05:16PM (#161375)
Not everyone wants to manage both a front-end server and six little mongrels running around just to run an app.