News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Kodak shares up as it announces KODAKCoin cryptocurrency by runeks on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @02:02PM (#16108758)
> Picture this: you snap a photo, its hash is on a decentralized public record. If someone uses this photo, you're aware of it and can be rewarded/credited appropriately.

Except if that someone changes a single bit in the photo data (which will result in a completely different hash).

Re:Kodak shares up as it announces KODAKCoin cryptocurrency by lightbyte on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @02:49PM (#16109258)
That won't stop you from visually identifying that they are the same, then just looking at the block-chain to see which hash was published first (and thus the real photo).
Re:Kodak shares up as it announces KODAKCoin cryptocurrency by fl0wenol on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @03:00PM (#16109393)
Unless there's a parallel repository of all the images in a form that's easy to search (some kind of sparse, feature-rich form that's quick CV-match friendly), which isn't the hash, you're going to have a hard time with that initial assessment and enforcement of potential infringers.

That right there could be a pretty expensive system to maintain and it isn't ideal to distributed across a bunch of blockchain participants, it probably has to live in a Kodak server farm somewhere.

Re:Kodak shares up as it announces KODAKCoin cryptocurrency by runeks on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @03:41PM (#16109841)
But who will determine whether two different images are visually the same?

What’s the point of a decentralized system if a trusted third party decides which images are visually equivalent? Just use that third party to register the image with in the first place, rather than in a blockchain, since that party gets to invalidate your image-hash in the chain anyway (in case your image is deemed visually equivalent to an image earlier in the chain).