News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sticker shock over Seattle's new sugary drink tax by LyndsySimon on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @09:36AM (#16106404)
> Even US has differing gun laws across states, so whatever mechanism is used to enforce those can be extended to enforce this

Ah, so stopping minorities to shake them down for soda.

In all seriousness, you can't just set up border checkpoints in the US. You'd have to have probable cause to stop an individual, and even if you stopped everyone you can't search them without a warrant (which requires probably cause) or their permission.

Re:Sticker shock over Seattle's new sugary drink tax by jasonpeacock on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @01:50PM (#16108658)
It's already been happening for a long time - California has border checkpoints for fruit pests:

https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/plant/pe/ExteriorExclusion/borders.h...

Re:Sticker shock over Seattle's new sugary drink tax by friedButter on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @09:50AM (#16106498)
Isnt checking for cross state border tax evasion considered probable cause? Just like how customs inspects packages coming from outside the country or even Americans returning from a foreign visit (Not an American, just curious.. since apparently this is a US specific behaviour)
Re:Sticker shock over Seattle's new sugary drink tax by LyndsySimon on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @10:10AM (#16106646)
> Isnt checking for cross state border tax evasion considered probable cause?

Nope. Probable cause is a specific legal standard in the US - the Wikipedia article gives a decent overview: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probable_cause

In short, it requires a reasonable belief that a crime has been committed.

Re:Sticker shock over Seattle's new sugary drink tax by ecshafer on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @10:02AM (#16106598)
Interstate trading is under the federal government, not state government.