Re:What Spectre and Meltdown Mean for WebKit
by littlestymaar on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @05:14AM
(#16104952)
A taxidermist could argue that dead animals are better than living ones : they are indeed more convenient, less dangerous and cheaper to feed. But they aren't animal anymore, are they ?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What Spectre and Meltdown Mean for WebKit
by letsgetphysITal on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @05:33AM
(#16105030)
Absolutely true. However, I'm not also not likely to find my stuffed cat slowed to a crawl and using all my electricity by mining Bitcoin because some 3rd party advertising network got compromised.
Any other daft analogies you want to use?
Re:What Spectre and Meltdown Mean for WebKit
by littlestymaar on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @05:42AM
(#16105071)
Your stuffed cat could not, but a living cat could bring you rabies if some third party in your neighborhood got infected, that's my point ;).
Re:What Spectre and Meltdown Mean for WebKit
by zingmars on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @05:59AM
(#16105144)
So your point is that we _should_ JavaScript?
Re:What Spectre and Meltdown Mean for WebKit
by PuffinBlue on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @06:08AM
(#16105194)
Who knows! This comment thread is so wrapped up in its own analogy i just stuffed my cat full of JavaScript.
Re:What Spectre and Meltdown Mean for WebKit
by optimuspaul on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @10:00AM
(#16106586)
I think it's obvious that the point was no javascript... but a live cat is way more fun, so I'm not on board with that.
Re:What Spectre and Meltdown Mean for WebKit
by UncleEntity on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @08:32AM
(#16105975)
> However, I'm not also not likely to find my stuffed cat slowed to a crawl and using all my electricity by mining Bitcoin because some 3rd party advertising network got compromised.
You obviously need to upgrade your stuffed cat...