News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is ... by TeMPOraL on Monday January 08, 2018 @04:40PM (#16100871)
> Pretty much every time her phone is placed out of sight, she turns into a fun, engaging person. But when it's in sight, she needs to have it, to mindlessly scroll, double tap in instagram, or whatever the latest app fad is.

Are you absolutely sure they're "mindlessly scrolling", and not just being fun and engaging to their friends on the other end of the social network?

I hate this assumption - one sees a person glued into an IM or a social feed and thinks they're just being a drone. They're not - they're engaging in an amazing achievement of humanity that is immediate communication that transcends physical boundaries. And quite often, what's happening on the remote end is more important than what happens next to you.

Re:The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is ... by ehnto on Monday January 08, 2018 @07:50PM (#16102482)
That is a very generous view. Many people are just scrolling aimlessly through a feed and not engaging at all. The addictive nature of the feed keeps them scrolling even when they can realistically gain nothing of value by continuing. That is the core of the issue.

I know what a rich and enjoyable online experience is like as for the better part of my life I spent most of it online. Facebook and instagram and other feed based sites are nothing like that. Most people don't engage that much with their feeds outside of hitting a like button or two, which is hardly a wonder of human social interaction.

Re:The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is ... by TeMPOraL on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @12:50AM (#16103919)
Yeah, this view I presented is a tad optimistic, but I see people in this (and similar) thread getting applauded for doing what's essentially a "proof from fundamental attribution error" - "people in front of a smartphone are zombies, therefore smartphone bad (but when I can be seen stuck in front of the screen, it is something important)" - and I'm trying to make a counterpoint.

That, and people forgetting how boring and irrelevant forced social ocassions can be, now that they can choose not to participate.

Re:The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is ... by ehnto on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @03:37AM (#16104522)
That's definitely a fair counterpoint, I've had to laugh at myself a number of times (right now, for example) when I'm making criticisms of devices while on a device myself.

I'm also a pretty bias because when I did start giving up my phone for long periods, my experience was excellent. Whereas my experience with social media sites and the death of all my previously favourite online communities has been a real bummer. There used to be a HN style community for every one of my interests. Now everyone is isolated in their own Facebook silos and there are fewer collections of random internet strangers, like forums, BBs and chatrooms would provide.

Re:The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is ... by Chaebixi on Monday January 08, 2018 @06:27PM (#16101918)
> Are you absolutely sure they're "mindlessly scrolling", and not just being fun and engaging to their friends on the other end of the social network?

Hasn't there been a drastic rise in teenage depression linked to smartphone and social network use?

Re:The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is ... by wst_ on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @12:10AM (#16103786)
Has it?
Re:The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is ... by donkeyd on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @01:45AM (#16104117)
Yeah, it has, apparently:

https://adaa.org/learn-from-us/from-the-experts/blog-posts/c...

The idea of a fully private social media profile actually scares my half-sister, since it would mean less likes on her posts, so her friends would get more. We had a conversation about this and the way she reacted wasn't pretty.

Re:The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is ... by TeMPOraL on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @01:58AM (#16104168)
> The idea of a fully private social media profile actually scares my half-sister

Not commenting on the motivations of your half-sister, but the very concept of a "fully private social media profile" makes zero sense, since social media is what you engage in to share stuff with lots of people. Compare with "fully private blog".

Re:The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is ... by donkeyd on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @03:15AM (#16104435)
Fully private wasn't really the right description. What I meant was only accepting people she actually knows. In stead of anybody who sends her a friend request. She has a couple thousand 'friends' now.
Re:The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is ... by TeMPOraL on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @04:38AM (#16104801)
I see what you mean now, thanks for the clarification.
Re:The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is ... by tbrownaw on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @02:48AM (#16104330)
Compare with "fully private blog".

It's called a diary or a journal.

Re:The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is ... by TeMPOraL on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @04:37AM (#16104798)
Touché.