Ok, I'm not trying to be snarky, but journalists aren't scientists. The article cites statistics that re-confirm what we already knew - that women are highly under-represented.

But what seems to be missing (and what I had hoped for) is research showing that "the consensus is that biological sex differences are not that big of an effect, certainly not enough to explain the gender disparity in tech." I feel like the article should be overflowing with references to this if it's a consensus.

It turns out that even this article admits that

> there’s very little scientists know for certain about which behaviors are due to biology, and which are because of society’s expectations of both men and women

The article essentially concludes that men are competitive.

Maybe I missed something in the article. Which citation really spoke to you and confirmed this consensus?