And it isn't even just a discussion about low density states vs high density states. Take one of the highest density states, Massachusetts. Its density is about 800 people per square mile. That's nothing... A square mile is almost 28 million square foot. You're talking about having about 35 thousand square foot, per person, of space.
In fact, here are some images of population density of 100.000 people per square mile, more than 100x more dense than one of the highest density US state averages:
https://ggwash.org/view/42469/what-do-80000-people-in-a-squa...
And here's an interesting article about the amount of space needed to give all 7 billion people on the planet a standard vancouver house+yard lot.
https://vreaa.wordpress.com/2011/12/09/land-not-making-any-m...
Which also cites another calculation on how the entire world population could fit into Texas if it were built as dense as NYC.
The issue isn't really sheer population, it's population distribution. Proximity to other people means proximity to jobs, culture, networks etc. And that means we see small plots of land become extremely scarce and in high-demand, and large plots of land become extremely abundant and in low-demand. You can see this if you look up economic heatmaps of the US, it's pretty insane. Most countries are basically a collection of a few cities where all the money is made and everyone lives. I wouldn't be surprised if cities became the dominant political unit rather than nation states. (not legally, but in practice). I can't find a great image at the moment but this gives an idea: https://cdn.howmuch.net/content/images/1600/where-the-money-...