News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Many packages suddenly disappeared by edejong on Saturday January 06, 2018 @04:20PM (#16087523)
I am very surprised that a package manager of this calibre and impact abstains from best practices when it comes to authentication through code-signing. Other package managers are miles ahead of NPM. For example, Nix, which uses immutability and hashing to always produce the same artifact, regardless of changes of the sources.
Re:Many packages suddenly disappeared by djsumdog on Saturday January 06, 2018 @04:50PM (#16087668)
So I know rpms and debs are signed, as I've setup repos for both. Docker repositories require a valid SSL key (or you have to manually allow untrusted repos). But do Python packages and Ruby gems have signature verification? How does pypy/pip and gem deal with validating a package is what it claims to be?
Re:Many packages suddenly disappeared by ek750 on Saturday January 06, 2018 @07:36PM (#16088352)
Ruby gems can be signed but the percentage of gems authors taking advantage of that is low.

At least we’ve got most people using https to transfer gems now!

Re:Many packages suddenly disappeared by cpburns2009 on Saturday January 06, 2018 @06:57PM (#16088202)
PyPI (which is what Pip uses) at the very least does not require authors to sign their packages. I can't say whether it supports signing though.
Re:Many packages suddenly disappeared by viraptor on Saturday January 06, 2018 @11:35PM (#16089186)
Traditional python packages support GPG signing: https://pypi.python.org/security

There's new experimental signing in wheels: https://wheel.readthedocs.io/en/stable/#automatically-sign-w...

and the signing defined in PEP: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0427/#signed-wheel-files

Re:Many packages suddenly disappeared by johnny22 on Saturday January 06, 2018 @05:33PM (#16087845)
comparing distro package managers is a ton different than free for all spaces like packagist, ruby gems, pypi, npm, etc.
Re:Many packages suddenly disappeared by edejong on Saturday January 06, 2018 @07:52PM (#16088402)
You have a point, but we need to take into account that the technology has been around for a long time, the risks are well known and documented, and safety concerns of most of these package managers have been addressed to maintainers.

The example in the article has come to light accidentally, but we must seriously ask ourselves how many incidents are currently unidentified.

Besides, you can use Nix for 'normal' development. It is suitable for more things than just a distro package manager.