Re:Meltdown, aka “Dear Intel, you suck”
by emn13 on Saturday January 06, 2018 @10:08AM
(#16085554)
They didn't unintentionally break security features; they knowingly did so - the potential for information disclosure was widely documented. In their defense - the solution isn't trivial in general, and large parts of at least spectre apply in ways a CPU would be hard pressed to prevent (how is a CPU to know that even though memory isn't marked as protected from currently running code in actual fact that's because the JIT and the JIT-tted code are running in the same memory space?). But the intel CPUs are leaking a lot more data than reasonable.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Meltdown, aka “Dear Intel, you suck”
by pritambaral on Saturday January 06, 2018 @02:13PM
(#16086917)
Your parent was talking about Meltdown; that's the one that breaks security features, specifically: memory safety of a higher privilege level from a lower one.