News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisal [pdf] by nl on Saturday January 06, 2018 @06:42AM (#16084852)
This isn't a great paper (as you can tell by how often the author cites himself).

It isn't really worth responding too - it's either attacking claims which are never made, or so outrageously wrong it appears to be trolling.

Re:Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisal [pdf] by srirachahot on Saturday January 06, 2018 @07:02AM (#16084909)
Most academics cite their own work... That’s not a quality marker, it’s the norm.

Care to give more info on your second paragraph?

Re:Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisal [pdf] by cosmic_ape on Saturday January 06, 2018 @07:13AM (#16084946)
Can you give examples where the paper is wrong? In large things, not nitpicking. I'm just genuinely curious.