Re:Ask HN: Please review our startup: historious
by StavrosK on Monday August 16, 2010 @11:26PM
(#1610147)
Thank you for your points, they are very good. I agree that the lawyer market is hard to penetrate, and that students would be a much better target, so this is what we'll try to do.
As for your second point, due to a security vulnerability with having cached pages on the main domain, we moved them all to another one:
http://cache.historious.net/cached/354992/
I think that is much more readable, and the number doesn't really have to have a fixed number of digits; it can increment infinitely. If we ever need shorter URLs we can base36-encode it and reduce the number of digits right away.
Thanks again for the insight!
Tricky pitch for a new company, of course - you haven't been around so long. Any sort of partnership with an existing one would help. Be aware that law firms in general are conservative about technology so it might take a year or two for the idea to catch on. A way around this might be to target law students first. Contact the editors at prominent 10-20 prominent law journals and give them free accounts for the journal and/or themselves as individuals; let them recommend your freemium service to their fellow students. Law librarians are another likely target, they spend quite a bit of time helping people with research tasks.
I think it would help if these 'permacache links' had some distinctive appearance that was easy to type from a printed page, eg 'http://historio.us/citations/username/98734545.htm <- numeric is easier than mixed alphanumeric if you have to copy it by hand.
In fact you could do 10 digits easily using a telephone format, and then ditch the user id string. 'historio.us/citations/####' is easy enough to become a standard link for public citation, and 111-222-3333 gives you room for 10 billion citations before you need to change the naming schema.