News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tim Cook Stumbles at His Specialty, Shipping Apple Produc... by typetypetype on Friday January 05, 2018 @02:58PM (#16081160)
Couldn't get past paywall, but it could be that Tim Cook is better at operations then whomever replaced him.
Re:Tim Cook Stumbles at His Specialty, Shipping Apple Produc... by neurothustra on Friday January 05, 2018 @04:41PM (#16081941)
Yeah, it's kind of annoying when you click on an article that looks interesting and it's locked up behind a paywall
Re:Tim Cook Stumbles at His Specialty, Shipping Apple Produc... by petercooper on Friday January 05, 2018 @05:19PM (#16082259)
People here basically end up discussing the gist of the title rather than the article when this happens.
Re:Tim Cook Stumbles at His Specialty, Shipping Apple Produc... by jsoni on Friday January 05, 2018 @07:07PM (#16082896)
Re:Tim Cook Stumbles at His Specialty, Shipping Apple Produc... by oil7abibi on Saturday January 06, 2018 @12:39AM (#16084029)
Nifty.
Re:Tim Cook Stumbles at His Specialty, Shipping Apple Produc... by briandear on Friday January 05, 2018 @04:55PM (#16082053)
You could subscribe to avoid the paywall. That's one option.
Re:Tim Cook Stumbles at His Specialty, Shipping Apple Produc... by mark-r on Friday January 05, 2018 @05:20PM (#16082269)
I'm not going to subscribe so I can read one article every month or two. If WSJ wants to ignore the long tail of potential readers that's their right, but we shouldn't be condoning it by posting links here on HN.
Re:Tim Cook Stumbles at His Specialty, Shipping Apple Produc... by grzm on Friday January 05, 2018 @07:18PM (#16082940)
The mods have been clear on the HN policy regarding paywalls:

From a recent comment by 'dang:

> "The paywalls suck, of course, but banning NYT, WSJ, Economist, New Yorker, and all other such publications would suck worse. I realize not everyone agrees with this, but it seems the right call to me, which doesn't mean I like it any more than you do."

https://hn.algolia.com/?query=author:dang%20paywall&sort=byD...

Re:Tim Cook Stumbles at His Specialty, Shipping Apple Produc... by mark-r on Friday January 05, 2018 @11:01PM (#16083778)
WSJ has changed their paywall policy over time, so I don't expect any policy written in the past to be optimal for the current reality - which is no access without a subscription, period. I know NYT allows a limited number of articles per month, and I'm fine with that. Don't know about the other two but I don't remember having any trouble accessing them.

If you already have a subscription to WSJ I expect that you'd be a heavy enough user that you don't need a HN link to inform you of content to check out.

Re:Tim Cook Stumbles at His Specialty, Shipping Apple Produc... by grzm on Friday January 05, 2018 @11:10PM (#16083807)
> "so I don't expect any policy written in the past"

The comment I quoted is from 20 days ago, and the mods tweak policies with some regularity. 'dang commented specifically on the WSJ just over two weeks ago here:

> "WSJ is an edge case, but paywalls with workarounds are ok "

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15977257

They're well aware of the situation. Yeah, paywalls are frustrating, and the mods are handling it as they deem best for HN. That's not to say it won't change in the future, of course.

Re:Tim Cook Stumbles at His Specialty, Shipping Apple Produc... by 1123581321 on Friday January 05, 2018 @11:10PM (#16083810)
If you subscribed, wouldn’t you start reading more articles? I think that’s what makes this kind of paywall strategy successful.