News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Update on the Twitter Archive at the Library of Congress by aylmao on Friday January 05, 2018 @11:34AM (#16079604)
The tone of the article seems also rather biased against Twitter. For example, it mentions;

> “Today, we announce a change in collections practice for Twitter. Effective Jan. 1, 2018, the Library will acquire tweets on a selective basis—similar to our collections of web sites.” The phrasing was elegant, but the sentiment was nonetheless familiar: “Quitting this shit!!!!”

No. That's not at all the sentiment I get from that. The volume has probably grown too big and it makes little sense to archive spend money archiving all of it.

Re:Update on the Twitter Archive at the Library of Congress by forgottenpass on Friday January 05, 2018 @12:13PM (#16079873)
These days I find the relationship between writers and twitter more interesting than twitter itself. It's like they still haven't internalized the properties of the medium that were well-understood back in 2010.

Maybe they're just the voice of perspectives that are more widespread, but every news or pop culture take I see about twitter seems to be born from the unexpectedly-complicated relationship they seem to have with becoming yet another head in an unimaginably large crowd of people. Where everyone can talk to everyone, anyone, or nobody in particular.

Re:Update on the Twitter Archive at the Library of Congress by teh_klev on Friday January 05, 2018 @12:01PM (#16079770)
Yep, the New Yorker article seems to be trying to make a fuss out of something that isn't there.