Where Pot Entrepreneurs Go When the Banks Say No

Re:Where Pot Entrepreneurs Go When the Banks Say No by apple_touchbar on Thursday January 04, 2018 @09:14PM (#16075940)

If the state laws were written explicitly referencing 'OTC medical use', I would agree.

However, the state laws of Oregon, for instance, specifically use the "recreational" terminology. It is not an invention of the media.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Where Pot Entrepreneurs Go When the Banks Say No by dragonwriter on Thursday January 04, 2018 @11:46PM (#16076627)

> If the state laws were written explicitly referencing 'OTC medical use', I would agree.

There would make it a much easier argument, sure.

> However, the state laws of Oregon, for instance, specifically use the "recreational" terminology.

Other states, like California, with general legalization do not.

> It is not an invention of the media.

The use of it for all legalization regimes that aren't predicated on a physicians recommendation is, though.

[ Parent | on HN ]