News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Productivity in 2017: analyzing 225 million hours of work... by johnfn on Thursday January 04, 2018 @06:02PM (#16074937)
What kind of activities are recharging?
Re:Productivity in 2017: analyzing 225 million hours of work... by rajathagasthya on Thursday January 04, 2018 @06:19PM (#16075027)
Speaking from personal experience, exercising will definitely recharge you. I used to think procrastination was the only reason I couldn't get things done as quickly as I wanted to, until I realized that I had low energy levels (installing RescueTime didn't really help that much too). I started to going to the gym at lunchtime at work and there was a marked difference in my energy levels during the day. As a bonus, exercise also helps you sleep well and I can't stress enough how important that is.
Re:Productivity in 2017: analyzing 225 million hours of work... by hinkley on Thursday January 04, 2018 @06:27PM (#16075083)
Exercise is a very high hurdle for people. Even harder if they don't have a successful history with it (like me).

I didn't get unstuck on this until a few years ago when there was a research paper that refuted the 20 minutes of uninterrupted cardio advice. I know too many people who feel like they're gonna die around the 14 minute mark, and they just give up.

Turns out that 3 intervals of 7 minutes is enough to show progress. You can duck out of work for 8 minutes in the afternoon and take a walk without even getting sweaty. Do it again at lunch and after work and you've got your 20.

Re:Productivity in 2017: analyzing 225 million hours of work... by Fnoord on Thursday January 04, 2018 @07:18PM (#16075394)
Doing 14 minutes is still better than 0 minutes. The difference between 0 and 10 minutes is likely higher than the difference between 10 and 20 minutes.

Start easy. Don't put the goal too high. Don't have a defeatist or perfectionist attitude (relapse is a natural part of changing a habit). If you have to stop earlier because your body tells you so, accept that, and retry the next day. Once you start doing it regularly you'll notice the difference. It will go easier. Especially in the start. Later on, you can increase your limit, aiming higher, until you meet your goal.

If you're doing it regularly and then end up skipping it once, the effect of that is negligible (unless you're pushing it but you're not an athlete, are you?). Just like if you're eating usually healthy and not too much the impact of that Christmas dinner is minimal. Just like with brushing your teeth if you brush them twice a day and end up skipping it once, it isn't a big deal but if you regularly skip and neglect your teeth there will be more of an impact.

Realizing that makes say losing weight, getting fit, and maintaining dental hygiene easier. Heck, it makes life in general easier as well since it is never too late to start compared to going on with the bad habit. I loved your GP comment as well, it makes so much sense, and has a similar soothing effect. Thank you for making that point.

Re:Productivity in 2017: analyzing 225 million hours of work... by gexla on Thursday January 04, 2018 @09:08PM (#16075920)
Doing 14 minutes when you aren't in your optimal energy zone can be worse than zero. When you are fatigued, you create more work by being sloppy or in general doing things which require more work down the line (especially for programmers).
Re:Productivity in 2017: analyzing 225 million hours of work... by fpoling on Friday January 05, 2018 @10:14AM (#16079049)
I go to a gym once a week. When I started 5 years ago, I was spending like 20 minutes doing high-intensity strength training. It was enough to make a steady progress and build muscles albeit slowly. After 4 years I hit a plateau. So now I spend like 50 minutes in a gym still once a week to continue the process.

I doubt that I can stick to anything that requires more frequent efforts. 15 years ago I begun to train karate, but training twice a week for 2 hours was too much so I eventually dropped out.

Re:Productivity in 2017: analyzing 225 million hours of work... by fineline on Friday January 05, 2018 @01:59AM (#16077065)
Maybe try different things. Some people "don't like exercise" because they don't enjoy the gym or running. But put them on a dancefloor / skateboard / ocean beach / roller-rink / climbing wall / mountain bike / zipline / parkour course / yoga studio .... etc, and it clicks. If your form of exercise requires "willpower" to do it, that's probably not a good indicator for long-term engagement. Personally, I hate gyms but I'd go surfing even if it made me fat.
Re:Productivity in 2017: analyzing 225 million hours of work... by dudzik on Thursday January 04, 2018 @09:30PM (#16076010)
Cooking recharges me. I have to set some time (1-3h) aside for it to work, which is the hard part for me.

There is something deeply relaxing in kneading dough and waiting for it to rise.

Re:Productivity in 2017: analyzing 225 million hours of work... by kaybe on Friday January 05, 2018 @06:29AM (#16077977)
I have a friend who recharges by baking. When he is stressed everyone in the vicinity eats a lot of cake. At times he comes in with 4 different cakes.. that's when you know it's been bad.
Re:Productivity in 2017: analyzing 225 million hours of work... by fapjacks on Thursday January 04, 2018 @06:38PM (#16075139)
Exercise and in particular, weightlifting. I've always run a few times a week, but things really changed for me when I started lifting. This won't be "recharging" necessarily at first (though it will be eventually), but it will definitely increase the capacity of your reserves before you need a recharge.
Re:Productivity in 2017: analyzing 225 million hours of work... by megy on Thursday January 04, 2018 @09:57PM (#16076131)
Running or cycling or swimming does it for me, oddly enough.