News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Buffer’s Salary Formula 3.0 by JustSomeNobody on Thursday January 04, 2018 @07:57AM (#16069974)
They should. All companies care about money first, so why shouldn't the employees? Having an awesome work culture should be something every company strives for and shouldn't make up for mediocre pay practices.
Re:Buffer’s Salary Formula 3.0 by ci5er on Thursday January 04, 2018 @04:12PM (#16074133)
I have a question (actually two) for you...

I'm thinking about comp for a company. I'm looking to make it (I think they call it) "remote-first", because there are some fabulous people on planet earth that don't live in the Bay Area. Also, I have no intention of living in the Bay Area, so it's selfish too.

Question 1: IF I had a goal to pay every new employee 10% above market rate - should I peg that to their locale or to the highest rate market (e.g. the Bay Area)

Question 2: SINCE I intend to grow 2x~3x YoY w/ no VC investment, the VCs are not going to pressure me to have a liquidity event at any particular time. That "uncertainty" means that stock-options are a highly speculative bet on the part of of the employee(s). Would you consider 30% of your base to be adequate to make up for the lack of options that would-or-would-not make in any particular time-frame? If not - what would be a nice kicker (for you)?

Re:Buffer’s Salary Formula 3.0 by humanrebar on Thursday January 04, 2018 @08:30AM (#16070172)
"Awesome work culture" for me looks a lot like "a place productive for technical work". This includes places to collaborate, freedom to network, empowerment of individual contributors to innovate and pitch, etc.

I'm not sure anyone except college hires (though we should be skeptical here, too) pick a company for the foosball tables, beer fridges, and intramural bowling teams. Having those things signals to me that I'm probably free to network with a contributor from another team to share some ideas, though.