Re:Why things might have taken so long
by haZard_OS on Thursday January 04, 2018 @05:27AM
(#16069235)
This distinction seems arbitrary. Couldn't I just say that rope itself wasn't an invention but simply a better kind of vine for climbing?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why things might have taken so long
by TheOtherHobbes on Thursday January 04, 2018 @05:58AM
(#16069362)
No, because that’s exactly what rope isn’t.
The crucial step is understanding that you can link objects with a bendable but strong connection.
Then you can start innovating applications, such as multiple people working together to move a single heavy object.
Eventually you end up with previously unimaginable applications like horse bridles and ship rigging.
The point of invention isn’t a new tool, it’s a completely new class of tools with an open-ended set of applications that aren’t immediately obvious.