Re:After beating cable lobby, Colorado city moves ahead with...
by kalleboo on Wednesday January 03, 2018 @09:39PM
(#16067551)
From the second paragraph of the linked PDF:
> Stokab was seen as a public infrastructure company by the City Council, much like a public organisation responsible for roads. As a consequence, Stokab was not allowed to sell active services, and was required to sell to any potential purchaser on a non-discriminatory basis
> Stokab was seen as a public infrastructure company by the City Council, much like a public organisation responsible for roads. As a consequence, Stokab was not allowed to sell active services, and was required to sell to any potential purchaser on a non-discriminatory basis