The Case for the Subway

Re:The Case for the Subway by electricslpnsld on Wednesday January 03, 2018 @01:49PM (#16063817)

And more accessible by transit. The parts of Oakland near BART are super easy to get to FIDI, Market, the Mission, etc, but huge swaths of the Town are miles from BART.

Hell, drop a few BART stations in Alameda you'd be a huge step in the right direction.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Case for the Subway by ebikelaw on Wednesday January 03, 2018 @02:11PM (#16064030)

The population of Oakland is more densely packed around BART stations than is the population of San Francisco. Yes there are “large swaths” within the city limits, but they are the least populous.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Case for the Subway by michaelleslie on Wednesday January 03, 2018 @06:31PM (#16066515)

Some Second Transbay Tube plans mention a stop in Alameda before entering Oakland.

Whether the project happens in San Francisco's lip-service to transit NIMBY climate is the bigger question.

[ Parent | on HN ]