Re:Chemists provide theoretical interpretation to understand...
by tpfour on Monday January 01, 2018 @08:51PM
(#16049256)
Hijacking this comment to shamelessly plug my project. We're holding a survey at https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1NXMpmD3DkDuAPgaOpLM2baJRyCi.... Our goal is to build the best platform for Computational Chemistry. Still in development stage, but I'd be glad to answer any questions. Also very appreciative of anybody who completes/shares this survey!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Chemists provide theoretical interpretation to understand...
by sseagull on Monday January 01, 2018 @09:42PM
(#16049453)
I'm a bit interested to see where this project is headed. My main question is what do you mean by "platform for computational chemistry"? A new package or an interface to existing packages (like WebMO)?
Re:Chemists provide theoretical interpretation to understand...
by tpfour on Monday January 01, 2018 @10:00PM
(#16049526)
We're building an interface like WebMO, but modern. We are not re-writing any quantum chemical software for the moment, however we've written some as grad students. For now we are concentrating on replacing JMol and getting our API functional with NWChem.
Re:Chemists provide theoretical interpretation to understand...
by sseagull on Monday January 01, 2018 @10:17PM
(#16049599)
Is there an email/website I can use to get in touch? I'm part of an effort that touches on a lot of these areas.
Re:Chemists provide theoretical interpretation to understand...
by tpfour on Monday January 01, 2018 @11:56PM
(#16049963)
Sure! Reach us at [email protected].