News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Accessibility Through Semantic HTML by nl on Saturday December 30, 2017 @07:37PM (#16038588)
I’ve worked on accessibility tools before and what you say is absolutely true.

But unfortunately it’s not worth pointing this out, or daring to think of better ways. I’d note your comment is greyed out, and mine suggestion (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16035056) is way into negative territory.

Better to just check boxes I guess.

Re:Accessibility Through Semantic HTML by jstewartmobile on Saturday December 30, 2017 @08:59PM (#16038896)
Text is pretty darn accessible to begin with. That the markup has gotten to the point where deciphering it with AI becomes a serious suggestion is fairly depressing.

Perhaps putting the HTML standard on a diet would be a more efficient approach?

Re:Accessibility Through Semantic HTML by nl on Saturday December 30, 2017 @09:01PM (#16038909)
Text isn't - and has never been - the problem. It's navigation, and richer information that just text.
Re:Accessibility Through Semantic HTML by jstewartmobile on Saturday December 30, 2017 @09:09PM (#16038945)
Are you sure about that?

I'm a perfectly able person, yet I've had to roll a number of bookmarklets just to make most sites halfway readable. And Jesus help you if you have to rely on a screen reader for the crazy sites we have today.

I think this lady was spot-on in her article, but everyone wants so much control that every website ends up reinventing the wheel, badly.