News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on C++17 constexpr everything, or as much as the compiler can. Parent comment

Re:C++17 constexpr everything, or as much as the compiler can by jcelerier on Thursday December 28, 2017 @10:24AM (#16022434)
or you can just use a C++ repl like Cling ?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:C++17 constexpr everything, or as much as the compiler can by HelloNurse on Thursday December 28, 2017 @11:00AM (#16022734)
What the C++ repl does with constexpr functions would be unrelated to the code generated by the actual C++ compiler.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:C++17 constexpr everything, or as much as the compiler can by marmaduke on Thursday December 28, 2017 @06:53PM (#16026225)
since Cling is just Clang in a REPL, it seems like it would be good idea
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:C++17 constexpr everything, or as much as the compiler can by reikonomusha on Thursday December 28, 2017 @10:32AM (#16022485)
I’m not sure that’s even close to equivalent in execution-time debugging, and doesn’t work well with large, existing code bases with crafted build steps. These are transparent, non-issues in Common Lisp.
[ Parent | on HN ]