News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DARPA's “Unhackable” Computer by nickelbox on Tuesday December 26, 2017 @10:32PM (#16012642)
I had forgotten Cyclone's name, thanks for the reminder. I've always felt kinda sad some of the small features like int@ didn't make their way back into C. I'm glad at least C++ has non-null pointers via references (but with stricter semantics and potentially undesirable syntactic sugar) and fat pointers via span<T>, but it's useless when I have to write in C for legacy reasons.
Re:DARPA's “Unhackable” Computer by nickpsecurity on Tuesday December 26, 2017 @10:39PM (#16012665)
Trevor Jim revived it a bit with virtualization for those wanting to play with it:

http://trevorjim.com/unfrozen-cyclone/

Re:DARPA's “Unhackable” Computer by nickelbox on Wednesday December 27, 2017 @12:33AM (#16013088)
Oh, that looks interesting, thanks for the link!