News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rust for Rubyists by dkubb on Monday December 25, 2017 @02:18AM (#16003135)
For me, it's always been select/reject/detect. Even though I know about find_all, it always seemed like the odd one out.
Re:Rust for Rubyists by odammit on Monday December 25, 2017 @11:49AM (#16004751)
Unrelated!

I haven’t talked to you in years. I wrote some DM plugins back in the day.

Hope you’re doing well!

Are you working on any interesting open source projects?

Re:Rust for Rubyists by dkubb on Tuesday December 26, 2017 @01:25AM (#16007445)
I don't recognize your handle, but nice that you remember DataMapper!

I'm doing really well, although I did kind of fall off OSS work as I got busier with kids and family stuff. I still hack on lots of different things, but nothing that I've been able to open source. I've been busy learning Haskell these days, although I tend to write Ruby for work.

Re:Rust for Rubyists by odammit on Tuesday December 26, 2017 @12:52PM (#16009737)
Glad all is well!
Re:Rust for Rubyists by fny on Monday December 25, 2017 @12:47PM (#16004974)
You're forgetting the existence of `find` which easily justifies `find_all`