Re:Open Source .NET three years later
by nine_k on Sunday December 24, 2017 @11:41AM
(#16000177)
This sounds as if skilled Java developers are harder to find that C# developers. Is this indeed so?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Open Source .NET three years later
by scarface74 on Sunday December 24, 2017 @02:09PM
(#16000814)
For me, Oracle is not as good of a stewart of Java as Microsoft is of .Net.
I wouldn't waste my time converting from a Java infrastructure to a .Net infrastructure and if I were a Linux shop, I probably would stick with Java for awhile, but if I'm already using Windows servers or have my choice today of using Windows only for the backend, I would definitely chose it because of the number of devs and network people available.
Re:Open Source .NET three years later
by Spearchucker on Tuesday December 26, 2017 @09:03AM
(#16008622)
I know why you said Java. But I pretty expressly didn't, because BigCorp won't know or care why you said Java. Technical smugness doesn't change the fact that Scala and Clojure are exotic, and that exotic carries risk.